It Sure Looks Like GM Is Copying Lucid’s Homework

Lucid Motors builds the most efficient electric vehicles in the world, and the rest of the auto industry wants a piece of that efficiency. Some, like Aston Martin, see fit to simply purchase the automaker’s tech. Others want to develop it for themselves. One of those companies appears to be General Motors, which recently applied for a patent on a compact electric drive unit that uses one of Lucid’s key architectural features: the differential-in-rotor design.

For those unfamiliar, Lucid pioneered a unique structural approach to building compact and efficient electric drive units. In most cases, an electric motor consists of an outside stator and an inside rotor, the latter of which spins. Many electric vehicles have solid rotors, but the inside of this structure doesn’t actually produce much torque. Lucid miniaturized its drive unit by making the rotor donut-shaped and putting the differential inside. Since it doesn’t experience wheel torque directly, this diff can be much smaller, lighter, and more efficient. This tiny differential drives two coaxial planetary gearsets, which drive the wheels. The 49:30 mark in this video from Lucid explains this very smart innovation better than I can via text:

General Motors’ patent application takes this core differential concept and applies it to a slightly different system. Interestingly, the automaker is cagey in the document about explicitly saying it’s putting a small differential inside of the rotor. In fact, the three-dimensional drawings provided with the patent omit both the electric motor and differential completely. The two-dimensional illustrations provided with the patent make it clear that’s what’s going on, though. 

The only real hint in the document text that the differential sits inside the rotor happens near the end of the patent, where it’s stated that it sits “upstream” from the rest of the geartrain. Other than that, no other mention of the differential or rotor in the text describes their nested nature. 

To be clear, there are several differences between Lucid’s drive unit and the one described in GM’s patent. The first big difference is that GM’s unit is not coaxial. The rotor, intermediate reduction gears, and axle outputs are all on different axes. GM’s unit is likewise a locking differential. This means it could be used in a performance or off-road setting where locking the diff would be advantageous. Lucid’s electric drive units do not have a mechanical locking feature, although the company’s dual-motor drive units offer complex torque vectoring.

The crux of the patent is that this new design would be compact and extremely efficient, which is naturally the same concept Lucid is chasing. The document claims that “In certain embodiments, the drive unit architecture described herein provides for up to 95% efficiency.” That’s very impressive, if its true. 

Until such a drive unit is released—this is just a patent, after all—we won’t know if GM actually plans to do anything with this design. It’s an appealing unit on paper, if not quite so theoretically compact as Lucid’s, and chasing efficiency is everything for automakers building EVs.